Turing Standard

AI Quality Audit & Assurance

Looks good isn’t proven good.

We measure the proof gap: the distance between how good your AI looks and how good it provably is. The numbers are reproducible: you get the same verdict on every prompt and model change.

7%

Maximum EU AI Act penalty (annual global turnover)

Aug 2026

EU AI Act enforcement begins for high-risk systems

6 months

Typical time to implement credible traceability

Proof Gap Verdict

Four layers. Each one a failure mode.

01

Data Layer

Is the source material accurate, current, and complete? Gaps propagate directly into answers.

02

Vector Database

Correct indexing, measured recall, precision against ground truth. A wrong retrieval causes a wrong answer, invisibly.

03

Retriever

Relevance, precision, and latency at the retrieval step. The model can only answer what the retriever supplies.

04

Agent Behaviour

Tone, relevance, correctness, speed. Traced back to which layer caused each failure.

How We Work

Three ways to engage.

Reality Check

Start here
Free

A self-serve scan that surfaces where your AI is confidently wrong. Run it yourself, same result every time.

  • Proof gap verdict: all four layers
  • Reproducible: re-run yourself, same result
  • Top-3 failure modes with layer attribution

Deep Audit

Fixed price

Expert-led audit of your full stack: data, vector store, retriever, and agent, with a reproducible KPI scorecard.

  • Full four-layer audit
  • Reproducible KPI scorecard
  • Quality gates for prompt and model changes
  • Cost and carbon analysis

Ongoing Assurance

Retainer

A standing discipline. Quality gates block any prompt or model change that fails your standard.

  • Continuous quality gate enforcement
  • Prompt and model change gating
  • Monthly reproducible scorecard
  • Cost and carbon savings reporting

Know exactly how good
your AI actually is.

Learn about AKE